< Back

ABSTRACT

Cost-Benefit Study of Febrile Neutropenia Prophylactic Treatment with Pegfilgrastim vs. Filgrastim in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors

doi: 10.24875/j.gamo.17000005

Full Article in PDF (English)

Estudio de costo-beneficio del tratamiento profiláctico de la neutropenia febril con pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim en pacientes pediátricos con tumores sólidos

doi: 10.24875/j.gamo.17000026

Full Article in PDF (Spanish)


VOLUME 16 - NUMBER 1 / January - February (Original article / Artículo original)


Norma Araceli López-Facundo, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hospital Materno-Infantil, ISSEMYM, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico
Ma. Guadalupe Valois-Escamilla, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Materno-Infantil, ISSEMYM, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico
Isidoro Tejocote-Romero, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hospital Materno-Infantil, ISSEMYM, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico
Cecilia Rodríguez-Castillejos, Department of Pediatric Hematology, Hospital Materno-Infantil, ISSEMYM, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico
Yanet Jaimes-García, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hospital Materno-Infantil, ISSEMYM, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico



Background: Febrile neutropenia is one of the main complications in cancer patients that exponentially increases treatment costs. Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated form of filgrastim, and it might reduce the severity and duration of febrile neutropenia, as well as costs. Objective: To analyze the cost-benefit ratio of febrile neutropenia prophylactic treatment with pegfilgrastim vs. filgrastim in pediatric patients with solid tumors. Methods: A cost-benefit study was carried out, where complete medical records of pediatric patients with solid tumors and febrile neutropenia who received prophylactic treatment with pegfilgrastim vs. filgrastim were analyzed. Clinical-demographic variables, febrile neutropenia events, and days of hospital stay were considered, as well as related complications and global related cost, looking for differences by means of Student’s t-test and the chi-square test. Results: Twenty-six patients with a total of 106 chemotherapy courses were included. Fourteen patients (52.8%) were administered filgrastim and 12 patients (46.1%) received pegfilgrastim. There were 57.6% of males. Mean hospital days of stay and costs were significantly higher in the filgrastim versus the pegfilgrastim group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of pegfilgrastim reduced the number of neutropenia and fever events, days of hospital stay, and costs by up to 30%.


Keywords: Cost-benefit. Pegfilgrastim Febrile neutropenia.